Annotated Bibliography

Article #1

Stripling, Barbara, et al. 2010. “Minors & Internet Interactivity: a new Interpretation of the LBOR.” Knowledge Quest 39.1, Sep-Oct.

Summary:

A collection of four articles addressing ALA’s 2009 Library Bill of Rights Interpretation from different aspects:

• A strict interpretation of the bill
• Teaching students how to respect Internet sources by providing students with the necessary knowledge and skills to protect their privacy or engage in responsible speech, instead of restricting or denying their access to the Internet
• Turning online resources into interactive learning tools while teaching students about the ethical use of information
• The consequences of completely restricting access to some Internet resources

Works Cited

American Library Association. 2006. Intellectual Freedom Manual. 7^th ed. Chicago: ALA.

American Library Association. 2009. “Minors and Internet Activity: An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights.” www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/intfreedom/librarybill/interpretations/minorsinter netinteractivity.cfm (accessed July 9, 2010)

American Library Association. 2010. The State of American Libraries: Public Libraries.www.ala.org/ala/newspresscenter/mediapresscenter/americasli braries/publiclibraries.cfm (accessed June 6, 2010).

Mashable/Social Media. 2010. “Facebook Passes the 400 Million User Mark.” http://mashable.com/2010/02/04/facebook-400-million (accessed June 6, 2010).

Lenhart, Amanda, et al. 2010. “Social Media and Young Adults.” Pew Internet & American Life Project. www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx (accessed June 6, 2010)

USLegal Inc. 2010. “West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette.” http://education.uslegal.com/student-rights-and-free-speech/free-speech-rights-in-public-schools/west- virginia-state-board-of-education-v-barnette (accessed June 6, 2010).

Article #2

Lamb, Annette. 2010. "Everyone does it: teaching ethical use of social technology." Knowledge Quest 39.1, Sep-Oct.

Summary:

Following the outline of the AASL's Standards for the 21st-century Learner, teaching students about their ethical and legal online responsibilities in conjunction with their right to free speech is an important component in a school media program. These efforts need to be made with consideration towards Piaget and Kohlberg theories of the stages of cognitive and moral development. Every student is at a different stage of development and multiple teaching strategies may be required to teach students the concepts of social responsibility in order to guide them through the decision making process.

Works Cited

American Association of School Librarians. 2007. “Standards for the 21^st-Century Learner.” http://ala.org/aasl/standards (accessed July 10, 2010).

Knowledge Networks. 2009. “Associated Press-MTV Poll: Digital Abuse Survey.” http://surveys.ap.org/data%5CknowledgeNetworks%5CAP_Digital_Abuse_Topline_092209.pdf (accessed July 10, 2010).

Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1981. Essays on Moral Development, vol. I: The Philosophy of Moral Development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

Lamb, Annette, and Daniel Callison. 2011. Graphic Inquiry. Westport, CT:Libraries Unlimited.

Lenhart, Amanda, and Mary Madden. 2007. “Teens, Privacy & Online Social Networks.” Pew Internet & American Life Project. www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_Teens_Privacy_SNS_Re port_Final.pdf.pdf (accessed July 10, 2010).

Piaget, Jean. 1953. The Origins of Intelligence in the Child. London: Routledge & Paul.